Data Descriptions#

(10 minutes)

Campaigns are participant driven and produce community wide data. Without our vast community, we wouldn’t have the robust ground-based observations that are part of the SnowEx collection. Discover the ground-based calibration and validation measurements central to the SnowEx field campaigns. Collecting in situ measurements require hours of manual labor and attention to detail. While observers adhere to standard protocols, they often rely on their best judgment and collective expertise when facing challenging sampling conditions.

Learning Objectives

  • Become familiar with measurements available for calibration/validation

  • Know the sampling strategy and naming conventions behind the campaign design

  • Learn where to find and search for SnowEx data

Ground Observations#

What ground-based data sets are central for snow field campaigns?#

Figure 1. Ground-based measurements central to the SnowEx campaigns. (Left to Right panels) 1). Depth Transects: Observer uses the MagnaProbe to measure snow depths. 2). Snow Pit: Vertical density cuts show the dual profile sampling protocol. 3). Interval Board/SWE Tube: Overnight snow being measured in a snow tube to record the daily change during the IOP campaign. 4). Specific Surface Area (SSA) being collected at a shallow tundra snow pit with the IceCube. 5). SnowMicroPen (SMP) penatrating the snowpack to record snow stratigraphy over a range of intervals (10-50m) away from the centralized snow pit.

Additional detail on depth transects and snow pit sampling procedures#

Depth Transects
Here you can see a summary of some of the depth sampling patterns you might discover in the snow depth data sets. Typically the pattern is a result of what instrument collection technique is deployed.

Figure 2. Examples of snow depth measurements taken in different spatial patterns, representing different spatial extents. a). shows pit-depth, square-depths with L-depths from a study plot. b). captures spiral-depths collected using a MagnaProbe. c). Includes spiral-depths and a single transect, ~10km in total length. Note the difference in scale across each panel. Background images are courtesy of @ 2020 Maxar Technologies Inc., Alaska Geospatial Office, USGS.

Snow Pits
There are a lot of measurements in a single snow pit. This diagram helps explain what all is measured at a snow pit.

Figure 3. Description of parameters that come from a single snow pit visit. The colored ovals on the images correspond to the colored measurements on the left side.


Sampling Strategy and Naming Conventions#

I: 2020 Grand Mesa, CO IOP#

Figure 4. Nine-member snow and vegetation matrix used to sample and name snow pits during the Grand Mesa IOP campaign

Vegetation Classes

  • 1-3 = treeless (0% tree cover)

  • 4-6 = sparse (1-30% tree cover)

  • 7-9 = dense (31-100% tree cover)

Snow Depth Classes

  • 1, 4, 7 = shallow (<90cm)

  • 2, 5, 8 = medium (90-122cm

  • 3, 6, 9 = deep (>122cm)

Flight Lines

  • ‘C’ = Crossline

  • ‘N’ = North

  • ‘S’ = South

Figure 5. Grand Mesa, Colorado IOP 2020 sampling design. The rectangles are the SWESAR, UAVSAR, Thermal IR, and Gamma flight lines. The point markers are the locations of snow pits.


II: 2020/2021 Western U.S Time Series#

  • Location ⇨ Regional Location with existing long-term monitoring infrastructure.

  • Site ⇨ Averaged unique snow pit site to represent the progression of Time Series snow pits.

  • PitID ⇨ 6-letter code unique to all snow pit sites; 2-letter state, 2-letter Location; 2-letter site name (e.g Idaho, Boise River, Bogus Upper = IDBRBU

  • Unique PitID ⇨ 6-letter site code and timestamp (e.g. format: XXXXXX_yyyymmdd_hhmm, example: IDBRBU_20200116_1345)

Table 1. Comprehensive Site Summary for 2020 and 2021 Time Series Campaign

State

Location

Site

PitID

Latitude

Longitude

Pit Count

Snow Class

CA

American River Basin

Caples Lake

CAAMCL

38.71029

-120.04186

7

3

CA

Mammoth Lakes

CUES

CAMLCP

37.64324

-119.02906

9

5

CA

Mammoth Lakes

Panorama Dome

CAMLPD

37.61964

-119.00029

6

6

CA

Sagehen Creek

Forest

CASHFO

39.42956

-120.24211

7

6

CA

Sagehen Creek

Open

CASHOP

39.43037

-120.23982

7

6

CA

Sagehen Creek

Tower 4

CASHT4

39.42216

-120.29898

6

3

CO

Cameron Pass

Cameron Peak

COCPCP

40.56381

-105.86761

16

6

CO

Cameron Pass

Joe Wright

COCPJW

40.52406

-105.89345

8

2

CO

Cameron Pass

Michigan River

COCPMR

40.51864

-105.89193

22

2

CO

East River

Aspen

COERAP

38.92529

-106.97109

9

6

CO

East River

Forest 12

COER12

38.92973

-106.97824

12

2

CO

East River

Forest 13

COER13

38.92943

-106.97777

9

6

CO

East River

Forest 14

COER14

38.92894

-106.97757

12

6

CO

East River

Gothic

COERGT

38.95925

-106.99053

9

6

CO

East River

Irwin Barn

COERIB

38.88812

-107.10796

13

2

CO

East River

Open 2

COERO2

38.92661

-106.97848

9

2

CO

East River

Open 4

COERO4

38.92627

-106.97907

12

2

CO

East River

Open 6

COERO6

38.92669

-106.97988

9

2

CO

East River

Trench 13

COERTR

38.92920

-106.97770

5

6

CO

East River

Upper

COERUP

38.93331

-106.98994

12

2

CO

Fraser Experimental Forest

JPL 1

COFEJ1

39.90556

-105.88282

35

6

CO

Fraser Experimental Forest

JPL 2

COFEJ2

39.90612

-105.88255

26

6

CO

Fraser Experimental Forest

SNB 1

COFEB1

39.90699

-105.87786

23

6

CO

Fraser Experimental Forest

SNB 2

COFEB2

39.90703

-105.87904

18

6

CO

Grand Mesa

County Line Open

COGMCO

39.03053

-108.03220

12

2

CO

Grand Mesa

County Line Tree

COGMCT

39.03223

-108.03438

10

2

CO

Grand Mesa

Mesa West Open

COGMWO

39.03399

-108.21390

10

2

CO

Grand Mesa

Mesa West Trees

COGMWT

39.03282

-108.21291

7

2

CO

Grand Mesa

Skyway Open

COGMSO

39.04511

-108.06209

21

2

CO

Grand Mesa

Skyway Tree

COGMST

39.04565

-108.06333

18

2

CO

Niwot Ridge

C1

CONWC1

40.03317

-105.54616

9

6

CO

Niwot Ridge

Forest Flat

CONWFF

40.03186

-105.54667

12

6

CO

Niwot Ridge

Forest North

CONWFN

40.03337

-105.55380

11

2

CO

Niwot Ridge

Forest South

CONWFS

40.04021

-105.55701

13

2

CO

Niwot Ridge

Open Flat

CONWOF

40.03579

-105.55205

15

6

CO

Niwot Ridge

Saddle

CONWSA

40.05497

-105.59065

7

1

CO

Senator Beck

Senator Beck

COSBSB

37.90705

-107.72626

5

1

CO

Senator Beck

Swamp Angel

COSBSA

37.90714

-107.71121

19

2

ID

Boise River Basin

Banner Open

IDBRBO

44.30456

-115.23601

11

6

ID

Boise River Basin

Banner Snotel

IDBRBS

44.30362

-115.23457

23

6

ID

Boise River Basin

Bogus Lower

IDBRBL

43.76434

-116.10660

17

6

ID

Boise River Basin

Bogus Lower Trees

IDBRBT

43.76057

-116.08979

13

6

ID

Boise River Basin

Bogus Upper

IDBRBU

43.75881

-116.09019

11

6

ID

Boise River Basin

LDP Open

IDBRLO

43.73707

-116.12179

19

6

ID

Boise River Basin

LDP Tree

IDBRLT

43.73634

-116.12053

17

6

ID

Boise River Basin

Mores Creek Summit

IDBRMC

43.94735

-115.67666

3

6

MT

Central Ag Research Center

SnowEx-1

MTCASX

47.05836

-109.95688

4

5

MT

Central Ag Research Center

Wheat

MTCAWH

47.05942

-109.95176

1

5

MT

Central Ag Research Center

Wx

MTCAWX

47.06062

-109.95693

4

5

NM

Jemez River

BA Flux Tower

NMJRBA

35.88859

-106.53184

8

5

NM

Jemez River

HQ Met Station

NMJRHQ

35.85791

-106.52137

8

5

UT

Little Cottonwood Canyon

Alta Collins

UTLCAC

40.57210

-111.62997

17

2

UT

Little Cottonwood Canyon

Atwater

UTLCAW

40.59125

-111.63759

20

5

Note - If a site was repeated (e.g. Cameron Pass, Michigan River) then the Pit Count column is the sum of the observations for two years). The Snow Class column was extracted from the 300 m Snow Classification data set (Liston, 2021 and can be accessed here at NSIDC). See the previous notebook to characterize the Snow Classes.

This table can be accessed as a geojson from Megan’s github gists

To use this as a geojson in your project:

  1. Navigate to the link above

  2. Check out the map of data (zoom in, zoom out, etc.)

  3. Select the ‘Raw’ button from the top right corner

  4. Copy/Paste the URL (it’s longer now)

  5. Use the code block below to import

import geopandas as gpd
import requests
url = "https://gist.githubusercontent.com/meganmason/dde13c46a90875e364b1c25a31bff1d8/raw/d361e1a56eeb867bd89c87b4dc13ed431ffff6f6/SNEX_TS_SP_avg_prelim_Hackweek.geojson"
gdf = gpd.read_file(url)
gdf.head()
State Location Site PitID Latitude Longitude Pit Count Snow Class geometry
0 CA American River Basin Caples Lake CAAMCL 38.71029 -120.04186 7 3 POINT (-120.04186 38.71029)
1 CA Mammoth Lakes CUES CAMLCP 37.64324 -119.02906 9 5 POINT (-119.02906 37.64324)
2 CA Mammoth Lakes Panorama Dome CAMLPD 37.61964 -119.00029 6 6 POINT (-119.00029 37.61964)
3 CA Sagehen Creek Forest CASHFO 39.42956 -120.24211 7 6 POINT (-120.24211 39.42956)
4 CA Sagehen Creek Open CASHOP 39.43037 -120.23982 7 6 POINT (-120.23982 39.43037)

III: Arctic Tundra and Boreal Forest, Alaska IOP#

Figure 6. SnowEx 2023 site locations in Interior Alaska (boreal forest) and on the North Slope (tundra) of Alaska. The flight lines for SWESARR (turquoise areas) and lidar/stereo (red boxes). SWE/snow depth measurement periods studied five locations: three in the boreal forest and two in the arctic tundra. The albedo/snow melt campaign period studied three sites in the boreal forest.

SWE/snow depth focused campaign (Oct 2022, March 2023, Oct 2023)#

Fairbanks area / Interior Alaska –> Boreal Forest

  • FLCF - Farmer’s Loop and Creamer’s Field (001-108)

  • CPCRW - Caribou-Poker Creek Research Watershed (200-283)

  • BCEF - Bonanza Creek Experimental Forest (300-482)

Vegetation Classes: (National Land Cover Dataset) D - Deciduous, E - Evergreen, S - Shrub, W - Wetland, C - Crop

Snow Depth Classes: B - Below Average, N - Average (neutral), A - Above Average

North Slope Alaska –> Arctic Tundra

  • UKT - Upper Kuparuk-Toolik (500-566)

  • ACP - Alaska Coastal Plain (600-800)

Vegetation Classes (Not used for Tundra sites)

Snow Depth Classes (SnowModel terrain, land cover, and snow depth output)
N - Neutral (windward), A - Above Neutral (leeward), D - Snow Drift, I - Ice Cover (lake/river) - only visited March 2023

Flight Lines

  • FLCF (2): North, SW

  • BCEF (3): NE, SW, North

  • CPCRW (1): East

  • UKT (3): North, East, South

  • ACP (1): NNE

Albedo/snow melt focused campaign (Apr/May 2023)#

Interior Alaska –> Boreal Forest

  • FLCF - Farmer’s Loop and Creamer’s Field

  • CPCRW - Caribou-Poker Creek Research Watershed

  • DEJU - Delta Junction Research Area

Figure 7. Farmers Loop Creamers Field (FLCF) field site (one of five SWE/depth focused study sites for the Alaska IOP). Snow pit study plots (colored points) distributed within the SWESARR flight swaths (green rectangle) and lidar flight box (red line). Pit sites are marked with October 2022 (white triangle) and March 2023 (black circle) site visits.

Figure 8. SWESARR science lines (yellow boxes) and associated flight lines (red line) over each site.

Figure 9. Represenative land cover classes for the boreal forests taken from the Southeast corner of the 5x5 m study plot.

Figure 10. The study plot sampling design for the SWE/snow depth focused campaign. Field crews marked the Southeast corner and measured square-depths around the 5x5 m perimeter on a 1m interval. Snow depths were collected on a north and west transect of 20 m (15 m addition to the study plot perimeter) or a spiral pattern was used depending on depth instrument availability. The snow pit was excavated in the center of the study plot. SSA measurements were collected inside the ~1x1 m snow pit. SMP measurments were taken at the front of the snow pit and up to 50 m from the snow pit.


Where can I find data?#

1. SnowEx data sets are stored and archived at the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) in Boulder, Colorado.#

Table 2. Summary of Core Data Sets with DOI links for applicable data sets

Core Data Sets

Parameters Available

Instruments

NSIDC Access

Snow Pits

Depth, Density, Temp., LWC, Stratigraphy, Grain Size, Wetness, Hand Hardness, Qualitative Environment, SWE

Standard pit kit

SNEX17_SP_GMIOP
SNEX20_SP_GMIOP
SNEX20_SP_TS
SNEX21_SP_TS
SNEX23_SP_Oct22
SNEX23_SP_Mar23 (prelim. avail.)
SNEX23_SP_Oct23

Depth Transects

Snow Depth - various sampling designs

MagnaProbe, Mesa2/Geode, Pit Ruler

SNEX17_SD
SNEX20_SD
SNEX20_SD_TS
SNEX21_SD_TS (in prep.)
SNEX23_SD_Mar22
SNEX23_SD_Oct22 (prelim. avail.)
SNEX23_SD_Mar23
SNEX23_SD_Oct23

Interval Boards/ SWE Tubes

New (or total) snow, SWE, density

Tube, ruler and scale

SNEX20_ST_GMIOP
SNEX20_IB_GMIOP
SNEX20_IB_TS
SNEX21_IB_TS
SNEX23_IB_Mar23
SNEX23_ST_Mar23

SSA

Snow reflectance, Specific surface area

IceCube, IRIS, InfraSnow

SNEX17_SSA_GMIOP
SNEX20_SSA_GMIOP
SNEX23_SSA_Oct22
SNEX23_SSA_Mar23
SNEX23_SSA_Oct23

SMP

Depth, Force (snow microstructure)

SnowMicroPen

SNEX17_SMP_GMIOP
SNEX17_SMP_SBIOP
SNEX20_SMP_GMIOP
SNEX20_SMP_BoiseRiver
SNEX23_SMP_Mar23

Visit NSIDC’s SnowEx Overview page to see a full table of all available 2017, 2020, 2021 and 2023 products.

2. SnowEx SQL Database (preview in next tutorial!)#

Recap#

  • You know which measurements we have a LOT of and are consistent between multiple field campaigns

  • You are aware of the basic sampling strategy for the various campaigns

  • You have a few tools at your finger tips to access and learn more about the data